Coin Pric

Amid apprehensions regarding FTX’s potential creditor sell-off, Bitcoin’s recent upswing could challenge altcoin skeptics, possibly triggering a robust surge in recently bearish bets on tokens such as Solana.

As Bitcoin (BTC) ascends, altcoins that have recently seen increased short positions, like Solana’s SOL, could experience heightened liquidation risks and amplified price uptrends. Following a momentary dip under the significant $25,000 threshold earlier this month, Bitcoin has climbed more than 6%, reaching approximately $26,600 at the time of reporting, based on CoinDesk figures.

SOL Price Movements

Positive retail sales and factory output numbers from China for August, disclosed on Friday, rejuvenated the financial market’s risk appetite, setting the stage for ongoing upward momentum in prominent digital currencies.

Solana is reflecting Bitcoin’s uptrend. This uptick in altcoins emerges shortly after traders divested from this token, anticipating the now-defunct FTX exchange to get the green light from bankruptcy courts to divest assets from its vast cryptocurrency reserves. Notably, after revelations of FTX’s $1.6 billion stake in Solana, SOL’s value plummeted by more than 8% on crypto exchanges like Gate.io.

This resurgence jeopardizes those who made leveraged downward bets on SOL and similar tokens due to anxieties about potential sales by FTX creditors. When market trends oppose a trader’s predictions, resulting in a margin deficit, exchanges may proceed to liquidate positions if the trader can’t supply more margin. The likely compelled liquidation of these short positions could further fuel a bullish trend in SOL’s valuation, potentially causing a rally driven by short squeezes.

Since the start of the week, perpetual futures’ funding rates have remained in the negative zone. These rates signify the expenses associated with maintaining both long and short stances in perpetual futures. Positive rates hint at a bullish leverage inclination, while negative rates suggest the opposite. The dollar amount committed to active SOL-related perpetual futures has surged over 16%, reaching a monthly peak of $338 million.

The union of growing open interest and negative funding rates indicates a recent uptick in pessimistic bets on SOL.

Solana’s DeFi Incline and Utility

The pathway to Solana’s resurgence is paved with tokens. But not just any tokens – it’s about fresh tokens minted by Solana blockchain teams that haven’t ventured into the token realm before. These are the lynchpins for injecting liquidity, catalyzing trading vigor, and crucially, ushering in a wave of new enthusiasts into a decentralized finance realm thirsting for these elements.

Solana has been hailed as one of the innovative platforms in the blockchain sphere, primarily for its lightning-fast transaction speeds and impressively low costs. One of its features is its unique consensus mechanism known as Proof of History (PoH), which introduces a cryptographic timestamp to improve overall efficiency and adds to the Proof of Stake we all know and love. This positions Solana as an attractive platform for developers looking to deploy scalable decentralized applications, especially within the burgeoning realm of DeFi. Moreover, Solana has fostered collaborations with several projects and strategic partners, facilitating a diverse range of use-cases, from gaming and NFTs to decentralized finance tools. This ongoing evolution and commitment to utility underscore Solana’s aspiration to be a cornerstone in the future decentralized web, making hundreds of supporters rush to learn how to buy Solana tokens. 

Solana Futures Explained

Solana futures refer to financial contracts that allow traders to buy or sell Solana’s native token, SOL, at a predetermined price at a specified future date. These instruments enable traders to speculate on the future price movements of SOL without necessarily owning the underlying asset. Like other futures contracts in the cryptocurrency realm, Solana futures can be used for hedging purposes, allowing current SOL holders to lock in a price and mitigate potential price volatility. Additionally, since these contracts are often traded on margin, they provide traders the opportunity to leverage their positions, amplifying potential profits but also increasing risk. The emergence and adoption of Solana futures underscore the growing institutional interest and maturity of the SOL market.

Is Solana’s Bandwidth Cost Excessive?

Prominent crypto commentator and Ethereum advocate, David Hoffman, has spotlighted a notable discrepancy in Solana’s token issuance versus the fees it amasses. Sharing his insights on X, a social media forum, Hoffman revealed that while Solana circulates an estimated $1.8 million in SOL every day, it only garners a minor portion in fees, roughly around $40,000.

Hoffman’s analysis suggests that Solana, in contrast to well-established networks like Bitcoin and Ethereum, may be incurring a hefty price for bandwidth. In the blockchain context, bandwidth denotes the quantum of data that can be transmitted each second. Traditional networks like Ethereum and Bitcoin offer relatively modest bandwidths in comparison to newer platforms.

While both Solana and Ethereum are equipped for smart contract operations, Solana boasts a superior processing speed, thus enhancing its scalability. A glance at transaction metrics reveals that Solana achieves over 4,800 TPS, a stark contrast to Ethereum’s peak of 15 TPS.

Furthermore, bandwidth assessments illustrate Solana’s capability to handle an average of 125 MB of data at prevailing rates, dwarfing Ethereum’s meager 0.08 MB per second. In public blockchain environments, a network’s TPS is closely intertwined with its bandwidth, which in turn impacts its scalability. Essentially, superior bandwidth enables more transaction processing.

However, Ethereum’s scalability concerns have ripple effects, notably influencing the fees it generates. For instance, during heightened network activity, Ethereum’s limitations push up gas costs, thereby boosting the revenue accrued by validators.

Conversely, Solana’s robust TPS often results in more affordable transaction fees. Consequently, even during high-demand periods, validators garner reduced revenue. This relationship appears central to Hoffman’s observation, given that a blockchain’s bandwidth is inherently tied to its validator count.

Ethereum’s Fee Dominance Over Solana

Current data underscores Ethereum’s supremacy in fee generation within the crypto domain. Fee amounts are intrinsically linked to user activity and network scalability, with Ethereum’s congested block space leading to heftier charges.

As of the cited date, traditional blockchains Ethereum and Bitcoin raked in fees amounting to $2.8 million and just over $869,000, respectively. In comparison, Solana’s fee collection stood at approximately $39,000, markedly lesser than even BNB Chain, and significantly below several Ethereum-based protocols. For instance, Ethereum’s Uniswap v3 garnered fees surpassing $569,000.

In response, Solana’s developers are gearing up to introduce the Firedancer validator client, boasting a tenfold bandwidth enhancement. This forthcoming client seeks to amplify efficiency by implementing a revamped transaction handling approach and distinct data architectures. The industry awaits to see if this innovation will gain momentum. If successful, Solana could potentially elevate its bandwidth and scalability, resulting in even more competitive fees.